Scouting Report
Auto-generated signals worth knowing before you read the deep stats below.
- Scott Askham is a KO finisher (100% of wins). Magnus Cedenblad has lost 50% of fights by KO.
- Scott Askham has 12pp better strike defense — meaningful gap.
- Stance matchup historically favors Scott Askham (53.5%).
- Magnus Cedenblad has a 10cm reach advantage.
Recent Form
Last 5 fights for each fighter — most recent on the right. Hover any result for the matchup.
Magnus Cedenblad
oldest →L
SUBvs Francis Carmont · Apr 12W
SUBvs Jared Hamman · Aug 13W
SUBvs Krzysztof Jotko · May 14W
KOvs Garreth McLellan · May 16L
KOvs Jack Marshman · Nov 16 latest Scott AskhamL2 streak
oldest →W
KOvs Antonio Dos Santos · Jun 15L
vs Krzysztof Jotko · Oct 15W
KOvs Chris Dempsey · Feb 16L
vs Jack Hermansson · Sep 16L
DECvs Bradley Scott · Mar 17 latest Output & Defense Comparison
Rate-normalized career statistics. Bold side has the edge per metric.
Magnus CedenbladMetricScott Askham
Net striking (SLpM − SApM)-0.64evenly matched on net striking-0.49
Statistical Profile
Career averages · bigger area = stronger across dimensions
Magnus CedenbladScott Askham
Recent Elo Trajectory
Last 10 fights for each fighter, aligned right (most recent on the right).
Magnus Cedenblad(6 fights)Scott Askham(6 fights)
Model Feature Differentials
Red − Blue for each engineered feature. Bar leans toward the stronger fighter.Hover a label to see what it measures.
ELO Rating— Skill rating gap. Larger = bigger experience/performance gap between fighters.
Red +131.1|Blue -131.1
Recent Form— Weighted win-rate over recent fights. Positive = Red on hotter streak.
Red +0.8|Blue -0.8
Striker Score— Striking output & defense composite. Positive = Red has striking edge.
Red -49.4|Blue +49.4
Grappler Score— Takedown & submission composite. Positive = Red has grappling edge.
Red -49.9|Blue +49.9
Red Corner advantageBlue Corner advantage
Strike Breakdown
Where the strikes landed. Head accuracy is the single strongest predictor of fight outcomes.
Magnus CedenbladTargetScott Askham
Round-by-Round Scoring (Model)
Statistical round-winner heuristic based on strikes, takedowns, control time, and knockdowns. Not the official judges' scorecard.
Round 1Magnus Cedenblad edged it
Sig. strikes9
Takedowns1
Control4:15
7Sig. strikes
0Takedowns
0:00Control
Round 2Scott Askham edged it
Sig. strikes8
Takedowns1
Control2:03
Knockdowns0
27Sig. strikes
0Takedowns
1:53Control
1Knockdowns
Round 3Magnus Cedenblad edged it
Sig. strikes6
Takedowns1
Control3:31
8Sig. strikes
0Takedowns
0:38Control
Statistical round count agrees with the official result.